"I am too boring to be tracked" Most common response I receive when debating about online privacy. As Denelle pointed, you are not boring if you have a credit card, family etc
Agreed. Also, people tend to undermine the responsibilities that they could have in the future, and how that could be compromised by the data held on them.
So true, I'm with you. What those so-called boring people didn't realized is that their so-called boring life is being tracked by numerous interested parties who want to take advantage of him or her, especially their own personal data.
The solution is to stop Google, Facebook, and these other tracking companies from collecting your data. Unlike YOU who say "I'm not afraid of google or apple or facebook" these people actually know the consequences of data collection, and do what they can to protect themselves so they never run into the problem you faced. It's your lack of knowledge that blinds you to what's happening.
Thirty years ago, I worked in the membership dept. of a quasi major art museum in Atlanta, Ga. (it was not a "High" point in my life 😉). Prospective members would ask if we sold member info; the manager of the dept. ORDERED us to tell people that we did not sell info; that was true, but what this woman would do quite happily, was to trade member info lists. A swap of member list with other museums and attractions? Gladly! A corporate sponsor of an exhibit or a special event? You bet! There was one benefit to this experience - beware!
"I'm not afraid of google or apple or facebook"....is a puzzling statement. I seem to be missing important information here. What could my son's classmates or other trolls find about me if the information wasn't collected, stored and shared by apple, google, facebook, amazon, microsoft and the likes in the the first place?
What her implied context was that she isn't worried about these corporations misusing the data themselves, because she trusts the established systems. That was the point of the entire video.
When we should be afraid of them more than trolls... and like she doesn’t know that those anonymous trolls collect that info from those servers, or steal from those servers
I know this video is over 5 years old but people have to understand that these trolls and unknown people are helpful in one simple but important way. They expose the holes and problems with this online structure we've created. With out them, privacy and online abuse would go unnoticed and quickly covered up. There is no such thing as true online privacy nor safety from online abuse. Negating it takes a large portion of the population to search and penetrate the weak points of the online world in order to come up with ways to reform the structure of it. I've learned not to blame the trolls and unknown online abusers. I've learned that the ones that support the online structure and it's creation should be help responsible. Not in the way where they should be punished or anything because no structure is truly perfect and not all holes and problems can be accounted for in the creation of anything. They should be held responsible for the redesigning and reform of said creation. but the biggest problem honestly stands with the laws we vote for because there's inconsistencies within the law.. and the government knows this and uses it to control most of us.. and it's the simple fact that.. Having freedom with bias restrictions create a seemingly infinite amount of problems. Having freedom of speech regardless of the speech is impossible. People will always be making rules of what kind of speech is free. Which negates the very essence of freedom is the best example for this. We all want speech to be not controlled.. until it affects you.. The hypocrisy of freedom goes unnoticed, and that's where the true problems lye. So what's more important, Control or Freedom? Both? Where is the line drawn if both? These will be the bases of debate for all of existence for the line drawn is different for every individual and it all comes down to opinion/ facts. A Democracy is a voting of opinions rather than facts.. But at the same time we also don't want to be communist because then the voting is of the opinion of the group in charge.. This is the problem with existence down to it's bases and core. I cannot wait to see if we can battle this problem with complete fairness.. Is it even possible?
And we need to remember to Think! Don't just sign up without thinking. Loyalty programs, those new home assistants, the need to use registered cards to travel etc. they all give away personal information. And most of all...read those "privacy" statements.
NOBODY!!! should nobody!!! have access to your personal emails your text message your voice messages your photos being able to listen in on your personal conversation on your cell phone those are grounds to be sued
I recommend using an email service like ProtonMail. Signal is a great messaging app. You can use it to send regular unsecured texts, but you can send and receive encrypted messages with other Signal users. Your can also send encrypted phone calls although they aren't as high quality as regular calls. Also, don't use Chrome browser. Use Firefox instead with good security and privacy plugins and no others. There are RUclips videos and websites that show what and how.
You have to stop listening to her after she says she trusts Facebook and Google. The biggest entities of gleaning all the information possible from you and what you're doing. She's worried about her credit score, not about anything else.
I guess the only way to protect our privacy online is to research the platform we are signing up to and make our decisions based on what we find. One can also try and find out whether or not they can make adjustments concerning privacy matters even if they are already using for example Facebook.
I was shocked and angry about this. I had no idea someone was looking over my shoulder, my whole life on here… People are just typing in questions that they would never ask another person’s, yet, here they are at their computer that the internet is a source of all knowledge, They have no idea that anyone is recording this stuff that they’re searching for… I am beginning to understand what it might mean to post things about myself on the internet…
The problem is we pay for things with our data, nothing is free. Facebook and Google are things that while they appear to be free, are things that we pay for with our data. I for one will always allow my data to be used by these companies so that I don't have to pay a subscription. Unless of course the speaker will pay my subscription, then sure I wont allow my data to be used. Data is an asset and as such google asks for payment in that form
Can I really just add here that It seems HIGHLY doubtful that oxford students on debating video's are saying "I would **** that" I have NEVER seen top comments reflecting this anywhere on RUclips nevermind an oxford debate video lol :O
The title is false. Online privacy really exists. But ofc if one creates himself accounts on social media like Facebook/instagram/twitter with real life pics, locations check-ins and others, he will automatically become a public person and others will be able to see these info. I guess someone who does this should assume the risks of being a public person. Other than that, with 0 social media accounts and staying behind a VPN should keep you enough safe.
Title: Privacy and Social Media Date of Release: January 2014 Author: Theodore F. Claypoole Claypoole’s study on modern social media’s privacy problem chiefly underlines the necessity of attitude awareness in an online world where collecting and selling consumer data is the norm. He cites how every ‘like,’ every shred of interest, every click draws a more and more detailed picture of the consumer that is then stored and sold. Claypoole skillfully developed his article through references to various state and national privacy laws and how they relate to those in other countries, as well as concerns raised before legislature such as the Bland vs. Roberts case in 2013. In drawing on a wide variety of current social media platforms and trends, the author shows that his article is motivated by and relevant to popular experience. Claypoole urges balance by pointing out that many people publicly post information that would be better kept between friends. For example, your future boss doesn’t need to know every detail of your college parties, and it can be downright dangerous for every random person in your town to know that you will be leaving your house for a week. In fact, it goes against the dignity of the human person to flaunt every private detail. “The bikini-clad body that is perfectly appropriate on the beach,” Claypoole writes, “may undermine the respect an employee has worked hard to earn from superiors, subordinates, and peers at the office who may view the vacation pictures on facebook.” Claypoole clearly seeks to inspire his audience towards the virtue of prudence regarding social media, by pointing out the truth of the consequences of oversharing online.
The point about privacy is valid. People should be able to expunge their data from these databses. But that doesn't give you a right to attack freedom of speech or categorically attack commenters or gamers. Their anonymity is their way of maintaining their privacy. You do understand that there really are just "a few bad apples" and people don't generally go out of their way to do these things, whereas companies do, right? I disagree about disengagement. We should engage in conversations to make real change in society, to fix the "bad apples". Not everything can be a monolog. And you ABSOLUTELY should be worried about big companies selling or breaching your data, which you actually alluded to.
People will gather and discuss you online and off they will take pictures and video and observe things you eventually in most cases have to give them your real name but you can give them as lil as possible but even friends gossip or fam or things are over heard
HOW CAN YOU EXPECT THE INDIVIDUAL TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR PRIVACY WHEN THEY PAY FOR A SERVICE. ITS THE OTHER WAY AROUND IT SHOULD BE. IN A REAL WORLD ALL THE PRIVACY INFRINGEMENT SHOULD HAVE BANKRUPTED THE COMPANIES THAT USED BECAUSE THEY COULDNT SECURE THE INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION. WE ARE NO LONGER IN A FREE MARKET BUT IN A TO BIG 2 FAIL SOCIETY AND THATS OUR PROBLEM.
You forgot to ask your audience to pay money for the online services that they use. If you don’t pay money you pay with your privacy. Either one or the other. Did you call Facebook and ask to create an option for a paid private account?
Well, the only surefire way to ensure your online privacy and security is to get a VPN. I would suggest using Ivacy VPN as I am using it for more than 2 years and it's super-secure.
12:10 ... huh? I was with her until she added bot ... theres a human behind every bot !? we need some new population counts cause somebody is lying about them 7 billion then :D
"I am too boring to be tracked" Most common response I receive when debating about online privacy. As Denelle pointed, you are not boring if you have a credit card, family etc
Agreed. Also, people tend to undermine the responsibilities that they could have in the future, and how that could be compromised by the data held on them.
I actually have been thinking like this the whole time... Wow this video really changed my perspective!
So true, I'm with you. What those so-called boring people didn't realized is that their so-called boring life is being tracked by numerous interested parties who want to take advantage of him or her, especially their own personal data.
Do people actually said that let alone even believe such?
Imagine talking about how crucial privacy online is only to say you trust companies like Facebook or google. Absurd. What a joke.
Every person can be traced, it's a matter of dedication.
The solution is to stop Google, Facebook, and these other tracking companies from collecting your data. Unlike YOU who say "I'm not afraid of google or apple or facebook" these people actually know the consequences of data collection, and do what they can to protect themselves so they never run into the problem you faced. It's your lack of knowledge that blinds you to what's happening.
Pierce Sonnenberg Yes! Exactly. Thank god there’s some rational people in this comment section.
I was just thinking the same thing lol. I mean aren't those companies activities the source of all this?
Thirty years ago, I worked in the membership dept. of a quasi major art museum in Atlanta, Ga. (it was not a "High" point in my life 😉). Prospective members would ask if we sold member info; the manager of the dept. ORDERED us to tell people that we did not sell info; that was true, but what this woman would do quite happily, was to trade member info lists. A swap of member list with other museums and attractions? Gladly! A corporate sponsor of an exhibit or a special event? You bet! There was one benefit to this experience - beware!
"I'm not afraid of google or apple or facebook"....is a puzzling statement. I seem to be missing important information here. What could my son's classmates or other trolls find about me if the information wasn't collected, stored and shared by apple, google, facebook, amazon, microsoft and the likes in the the first place?
What her implied context was that she isn't worried about these corporations misusing the data themselves, because she trusts the established systems. That was the point of the entire video.
When we should be afraid of them more than trolls... and like she doesn’t know that those anonymous trolls collect that info from those servers, or steal from those servers
My FB profile was cloned and I'm on dating sites and most assuredly... more.. FYI
Not afraid of Facebook? They're one of the big suppliers of personal data to those unknown actors that concern her.
some of us were smart enough to never register an account @ facebook.
Indeed.
Should be aware of FB and messenger. I know...they know what is going on but does nada. I was hacked big time. FYI
I hacked back and what I learned is how big they are...
Topher S Not really. It all stays within the ecosystem.
I know this video is over 5 years old but people have to understand that these trolls and unknown people are helpful in one simple but important way. They expose the holes and problems with this online structure we've created. With out them, privacy and online abuse would go unnoticed and quickly covered up. There is no such thing as true online privacy nor safety from online abuse. Negating it takes a large portion of the population to search and penetrate the weak points of the online world in order to come up with ways to reform the structure of it. I've learned not to blame the trolls and unknown online abusers. I've learned that the ones that support the online structure and it's creation should be help responsible. Not in the way where they should be punished or anything because no structure is truly perfect and not all holes and problems can be accounted for in the creation of anything. They should be held responsible for the redesigning and reform of said creation. but the biggest problem honestly stands with the laws we vote for because there's inconsistencies within the law.. and the government knows this and uses it to control most of us.. and it's the simple fact that.. Having freedom with bias restrictions create a seemingly infinite amount of problems. Having freedom of speech regardless of the speech is impossible. People will always be making rules of what kind of speech is free. Which negates the very essence of freedom is the best example for this. We all want speech to be not controlled.. until it affects you.. The hypocrisy of freedom goes unnoticed, and that's where the true problems lye. So what's more important, Control or Freedom? Both? Where is the line drawn if both? These will be the bases of debate for all of existence for the line drawn is different for every individual and it all comes down to opinion/ facts. A Democracy is a voting of opinions rather than facts.. But at the same time we also don't want to be communist because then the voting is of the opinion of the group in charge.. This is the problem with existence down to it's bases and core. I cannot wait to see if we can battle this problem with complete fairness.. Is it even possible?
And we need to remember to Think! Don't just sign up without thinking. Loyalty programs, those new home assistants, the need to use registered cards to travel etc. they all give away personal information. And most of all...read those "privacy" statements.
Why was the video cut at 13:14 and patched to another moment..?
NOBODY!!! should nobody!!! have access to your personal emails your text message your voice messages your photos being able to listen in on your personal conversation on your cell phone those are grounds to be sued
I recommend using an email service like ProtonMail. Signal is a great messaging app. You can use it to send regular unsecured texts, but you can send and receive encrypted messages with other Signal users. Your can also send encrypted phone calls although they aren't as high quality as regular calls. Also, don't use Chrome browser. Use Firefox instead with good security and privacy plugins and no others. There are RUclips videos and websites that show what and how.
Yet you have a Google account?
Dang right!
You have to stop listening to her after she says she trusts Facebook and Google. The biggest entities of gleaning all the information possible from you and what you're doing.
She's worried about her credit score, not about anything else.
I guess the only way to protect our privacy online is to research the platform we are signing up to and make our decisions based on what we find. One can also try and find out whether or not they can make adjustments concerning privacy matters even if they are already using for example Facebook.
You can turn RUclips comments off.
I was shocked and angry about this. I had no idea someone was looking over my shoulder, my whole life on here…
People are just typing in questions that they would never ask another person’s, yet, here they are at their computer that the internet is a source of all knowledge,
They have no idea that anyone is recording this stuff that they’re searching for…
I am beginning to understand what it might mean to post things about myself on the internet…
I wouldn't worry about it. This video doesn't seems to almost touch on an actual issue but goes completely in the wrong way, it's idiotic.
Speaking of unknown villains with unbelievable amounts of your data, do you still trust Facebook?
Divorce proceedings are not private. They are public information and anyone can get court rulings. She’s incorrect saying they are private.
The problem is we pay for things with our data, nothing is free. Facebook and Google are things that while they appear to be free, are things that we pay for with our data. I for one will always allow my data to be used by these companies so that I don't have to pay a subscription. Unless of course the speaker will pay my subscription, then sure I wont allow my data to be used. Data is an asset and as such google asks for payment in that form
Never ever spend bank card in shops. Always use cash.
Can I really just add here that It seems HIGHLY doubtful that oxford students on debating video's are saying "I would **** that" I have NEVER seen top comments reflecting this anywhere on RUclips nevermind an oxford debate video lol :O
The title is false. Online privacy really exists. But ofc if one creates himself accounts on social media like Facebook/instagram/twitter with real life pics, locations check-ins and others, he will automatically become a public person and others will be able to see these info. I guess someone who does this should assume the risks of being a public person.
Other than that, with 0 social media accounts and staying behind a VPN should keep you enough safe.
In the online platform I'm building, you are somebody and nobody at the exact same time.
You are building an online platform? What kind, & what is it used for?
Stellar to the moooooon!
It's 2018. People can't stay offline. Ordinary online actions could easily get misread by snoopers.
Can someone explain the whole thing in this video? Too bored to watch it all (I fell asleep)
Title: Privacy and Social Media
Date of Release: January 2014
Author: Theodore F. Claypoole
Claypoole’s study on modern social media’s privacy problem chiefly underlines the necessity of attitude awareness in an online world where collecting and selling consumer data is the norm. He cites how every ‘like,’ every shred of interest, every click draws a more and more detailed picture of the consumer that is then stored and sold. Claypoole skillfully developed his article through references to various state and national privacy laws and how they relate to those in other countries, as well as concerns raised before legislature such as the Bland vs. Roberts case in 2013. In drawing on a wide variety of current social media platforms and trends, the author shows that his article is motivated by and relevant to popular experience. Claypoole urges balance by pointing out that many people publicly post information that would be better kept between friends. For example, your future boss doesn’t need to know every detail of your college parties, and it can be downright dangerous for every random person in your town to know that you will be leaving your house for a week. In fact, it goes against the dignity of the human person to flaunt every private detail. “The bikini-clad body that is perfectly appropriate on the beach,” Claypoole writes, “may undermine the respect an employee has worked hard to earn from superiors, subordinates, and peers at the office who may view the vacation pictures on facebook.” Claypoole clearly seeks to inspire his audience towards the virtue of prudence regarding social media, by pointing out the truth of the consequences of oversharing online.
with no algorithm for the truth, how can AIs "know" the difference between real comments, and faked comments by say a rival or a Cyber Bully?
The point about privacy is valid. People should be able to expunge their data from these databses.
But that doesn't give you a right to attack freedom of speech or categorically attack commenters or gamers. Their anonymity is their way of maintaining their privacy. You do understand that there really are just "a few bad apples" and people don't generally go out of their way to do these things, whereas companies do, right?
I disagree about disengagement. We should engage in conversations to make real change in society, to fix the "bad apples". Not everything can be a monolog.
And you ABSOLUTELY should be worried about big companies selling or breaching your data, which you actually alluded to.
I think it is a bit shortsighted to say you ‘know’ and ‘trust’ billion dollar companies that sell your data.
Using humble bragging as an opener an otherwise good speech? Now this is how you tell she's a classy lady.
People will gather and discuss you online and off they will take pictures and video and observe things you eventually in most cases have to give them your real name but you can give them as lil as possible but even friends gossip or fam or things are over heard
Zoe Quinn did not make a false accusation, she deserved it.
@8:09 oh it's so scary, so scary.. I think someone got on Ted Talks and decided to go for the Over dramatic Award of The Year - or just go WOKE...
HOW CAN YOU EXPECT THE INDIVIDUAL TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR PRIVACY WHEN THEY PAY FOR A SERVICE. ITS THE OTHER WAY AROUND IT SHOULD BE. IN A REAL WORLD ALL THE PRIVACY INFRINGEMENT SHOULD HAVE BANKRUPTED THE COMPANIES THAT USED BECAUSE THEY COULDNT SECURE THE INDIVIDUAL INFORMATION. WE ARE NO LONGER IN A FREE MARKET BUT IN A TO BIG 2 FAIL SOCIETY AND THATS OUR PROBLEM.
Good lecture... I will follow her...... after finding in google and facebook.
This stage is reserved for propaganda pushers!
She also had the option, to turn comments off.
You actually don t know about companies?? We need to go into another direction in the future. I nature is the next big thing
Still.No.Privacy?
What.The.Fudge!
You forgot to ask your audience to pay money for the online services that they use. If you don’t pay money you pay with your privacy. Either one or the other. Did you call Facebook and ask to create an option for a paid private account?
denelle is a baller
Well, the only surefire way to ensure your online privacy and security is to get a VPN. I would suggest using Ivacy VPN as I am using it for more than 2 years and it's super-secure.
TOR provides greater security.
Unfortunately, the NSA can crack pretty much all VPN services using something called XKeyscore
I love facebook, don't use it but I have big hopes for their stocks lol
12:10 ... huh? I was with her until she added bot ... theres a human behind every bot !? we need some new population counts cause somebody is lying about them 7 billion then :D
She's all over the place here...might as well have said nothing.
Nah your just to dense to comprehend , she hit the target.
NO ONE LISTENED TO ME SO REALLY.. THEY DO WHAT THEY WANT AND I LEARNED NADA HERE. WHO REALLY KNOWS...
I'll tap that too 😩
No need for the language.
To late. ..now your government does this.
disable the comment lady!
how do you do that im only seeing options to thumbs up or down and reply where is the option to disable the comment or report it
@@sirvapalot you can only do it on your own videos, and in the settings of the video.
Theres not enough smart people on the internet to make a positive change like that 😔
" just report them " - bruh
Very enlightening
Denelle PLEASE HELP ME! I have been being cyber stalked for too many years & no one is smart enough or even capable of helping.
just dont put urself out there
There is law enforcement for that. Contact them.
Alac committed suicide.
good job.
the way. of talking is lit.
:);)
Monopoly
But you LIKE THE STRANGER your afraid of??? Hmmmm
I f@(& that too jk
I feel ya. 👊(Big-time) Shouldn't say it though. But I believe in free speech. So , Say whats on your mind Mr.Chan
First comment :)
How about wearing a hijab and a bra, if you don't like comments like that?
Tf? What is this
@@shai17altamiranoanco77 Go look it up.
*lol*